Legal Opinion

Klimek v. Continental Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1985No. 79-3861-L-2; 80-537-NJ-2; 80-1155-J-1; CA A31627PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This controversy, which is before us for the second time, arises out of a contract for the sale of standing timber entered into on June 6, 1979, between the Klimeks,1 sellers, and Burdett, Gedymin, Smith and Brannon, purchasers. The Continental Insurance Company, as surety, executed a performance bond on behalf of purchasers. The issues in this appeal relate to the propriety of summary judgment entered against Continental on Klimeks’ action against it on the performance bond, the rate of interest on the judgment and the amount of attorney fees awarded to Klimeks against Continental. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Office Services Corp. of America v. CAS Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Kutbi v. Thunderlion Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Klimek v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Cottage Grove Lumber Co. v. LillegrenOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Guthrie Investments, Inc. v. StantonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Sur. Co. v. Bd. of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API