Legal Opinion

Ariani v. Antony J. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 17, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0349Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TOKTAM HOSSEINNEZHAD ARIANI, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 25-cv-349 (TSC) v. MARCO RUBIO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are 58 Iranian nationals whose visa applications were refused under 8 U.S.C. § 1201(g) and placed into administrative processing. They sued the Secretary of State and another State Department official, seeking to compel further action on their refused applications. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendants now move for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that State Department officials have no duty to act on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API