Legal Opinion

Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Reliance Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 13, 1969No. Gen. No. 52,925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burman

The Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (hereinafter sometimes called “plaintiff”), as subcontractor to Taheny Brothers Company (hereinafter sometimes called “Taheny”), filed suit against defendant Taheny as general contractor to the Chicago Transit Authority and against Reliance Insurance Company (hereinafter sometimes called “Reliance”) as surety for the general contractor on a payment and performance bond given by Taheny to the CTA pursuant to sections 1 and 2 of the Payment Bond Statute (Ill Rev Stats, c 29, §§ 15, 16). In its four-count complaint, plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Board of Education Ex Rel. Anning-Johnson Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Reliance InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United States of America, Defendant-Third Party v. Mt. Vernon Township High School District 201, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API