Legal Opinion

Vick v. Georgia Power Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1934No. 10196PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. R. Hutcheson, J.

(After stating the facts.) The burden was on the plaintiff to make out his case as brought, by a preponderance of the evidence, and to do so with that degree of clearness and certainty as would show his right to recover on one of the following grounds: (1) That his intestate died seized and possessed of the land in dispute. (2) On prior possession alone. (3) On title in his intestate by prescription.

The intestate, Abner M. Vick, it appears from testimony of plaintiff, had moved off the disputed land, allowed the houses to burn, fences to decay, and the place to grow up in waste or pasture…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashley v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Stamper v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  3. Sutton v. McLeodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  4. Glover v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beck v. OdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Fitzpatrick v. Massee-Felton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Mills v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. Bright v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Burgin v. PickronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API