Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 6, 1961No. Record 5205Published

The opinion states the case.

1DissentSpratley, J.

I am of opinion that the decree of the trial court should be affirmed. For more than fifty years since the enactment of Code § 38.1-336, Acts 1906, p. 122, c. 2,-§ 28, we have repeatedly and consistently held that when a misrepresentation has been established in an application for an insurance policy, the materiality of the misrepresentation as affecting the risk to be assumed is a question for. the court.

In 1910, President Keith of this Court, an able and distinguished judge, said in Metropolitan Insurance Co. v. Hayslett, 111 Va. 107, 112, 68 S. E. 256: “Whether a representation is made and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flannagan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  2. Inter-Ocean Insurance v. HarkraderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. RatcliffeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  5. North River Insurance v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API