Moore v. Microsoft Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for deceptive trade practices, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated June 5, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the End-User License Agreement (hereinafter the EULA) contained in the defendant’s software program is a validly binding contract between the parties which bars the plaintiffs claims (see Brower v Gateway 2000, 246 AD2d 246). The terms of the EULA were prominently…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- ProCD, Inc. v. ZeidenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kaminsky v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Berkson v. Gogo LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Broker Genius, Inc. v. ZaltaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Smallwood v. NCsoft Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.