Legal Opinion

John H. Chizen v. John J. Hunter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1987No. 85-5814PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

John H. Chizen (Chizen) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. In his petition, Chizen challenges the voluntariness of his nolo contendere plea to a state charge of misdemeanor child molesting. Because we find that Chizen’s plea was not voluntary, we reverse and remand to the state district court.

I. FACTS

Chizen, a physician, was charged with violating Cal.Pen.Code § 647(a) (child molesting) and Cal.Pen.Code § 272 (contributing to the delinquency of a minor). Chizen pleaded nolo contendere (“no contest”) to the child molesting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Carlos CortezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Doe v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Alejandro Ferreira-AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Mark Roy AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API