Legal Opinion

United States v. Petersen

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 18, 1982No. ACM 23491PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted of use and possession of marijuana, communication of threats, dereliction of duty, and perjury, in violation of Articles 134, 92 and 131, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 934, 892 and 931.* He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, total forfeitures and reduction to airman basic.

The accused now contends the military judge should have disqualified himself because he served as military judge in a prior trial of a prosecution witness. We disagree.

A military judge is not subject to…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LynchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. PettersenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. PulliamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MackU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API