Legal Opinion

Kolbe v. Aegis Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1987No. 00479PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This appeal by the Plaintiff-Appellant arises from a judgment entered following an order by the lower court which sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. In his suit, the Plaintiff sought a recovery pursuant to underinsured motorist provisions of a policy of insurance issued to him by the Defendant-Appellee.

In reviewing this appeal, we must accept as true all of the Plaintiff’s well-pleaded averments of fact in his Complaint, as well as all inferences reasonably deducible therefrom. Mahoney v. Furches, 503 Pa. 60, 468 A.2d 458 (1983); Zelik v. Daily…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. FurchesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Byrne v. KanigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Zelik v. Daily News Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Bazinet v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. Engle v. National Council, Junior Order United American Mechanics of U. S. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strickler v. HuffineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Kronjaeger v. Buckeye Union InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Eugene A. Fisher, Administrator of the Estate of Julie Lynn Fisher, Deceased v. Usaa Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Archer v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Federated Service Insurance v. GranadosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API