Legal Opinion

Ureneck v. Xu Yingnong

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 6, 2002Published

1Opinion of the CourtWinslow, J.

The plaintiff, Joseph Ureneck as assignee of Rainbow Marriage International Marriage Service Incorporated (“Rainbow”), appeals from a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, Xu Yingnong (“Ms. Xu”), a California resident Rainbow seeks to collect contract damages under a marriage brokerage agreement as a result of Ms. Xu’s marriage to a man to whom she was introduced by Rainbow. For the reasons stated below, we affirm dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Based on the contract and undisputed facts of the parties’ affidavits, the district court justice could have…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API