Legal Opinion

Covington v. Shackleford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1953No. 5-213, 5-214, 5-215, 5-216 and 5-217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grifein Smith, Chief Justice.

Appellants are citizens and taxpayers of Garland county. Five townships are involved: Farmer, Sulphur, Bain, Mill, and Lee. Petitions asking that local option elections be held in each township were duly filed and by the county court found to be sufficient. Appeals were concurrently taken to circuit court where findings of the county court were upheld May 16, 1943, thus paving the way for a public expression by the electorate. Motions for new trials were overruled May 20th, with ten days for bills of exceptions. On May 28th the appellants were given an additional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayen v. MayenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Maple Slough Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Vietz v. Hazen, Lagrue & Slovak Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Van Gundy v. Caudle, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Taylor v. Board of Commissioners of Cache River Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ricci v. PooleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. K. C. S. Railway Co. v. Ark. Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API