Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Washington v. Donald J. Trump

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 2017No. 17-35105Published

1Dissent

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA and IKUTA join,

dissenting from the denial of reconsideration en banc.

I write separately to highlight two peculiar features of the panel’s opinion. First, the panel’s reasoning rests solely on Due Process. But the vast majority of foreigners covered by the executive order have no Due Process rights. Nevertheless, the district court enjoined the order’s travel provisions in their entirety, even as applied to the millions of aliens who have no constitu*1172tional rights whatsoever because they have never set foot oh American soil.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. International Refugee Assistance Project v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
  4. In the Matter of the Petition for Naturalization of Arthur Espineli Reyes. Arthur Espineli Reyes v. U.S. Department of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hawai'i v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API