Black v. Pittsburg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 188, Oct. T., 1910, by Alice D. Carmichael, a taxpayer, from an order of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 197, dismissing petition to intervene in case of S. W. Black and J. H. Park v. City of Pittsburg. Petition to intervene.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 188, Oct. T., 1910, by Alice D. Carmichael, a taxpayer, from an order of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 197, dismissing petition to intervene in case of S. W. Black and J. H. Park v. City of Pittsburg. Petition to intervene. The facts appear in the following opinion of Shaeer, J.: In each of these cases, Alice D. Carmichael has presented her petition alleging that she is a taxpayer of the city of Pittsburg, and that in each of these cases legal proceedings have been had which are to the detriment of the city and, therefore, to her loss as a taxpayer. In the first…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The order of the court below is affirmed at appellant’s costs on its opinion dismissing her petitions.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Derk v. Zerbe TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Morris v. Coal Min. Co. of GracetonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Zakrzeski v. Ashley School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1942