Legal Opinion
Nuss v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 5, 1954No. 49586PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs Nuss, Turkle and Church, a partnership doing business under the trade name Alliance Seamless Casket Co., seek compensation for alleged breach of a contract implied in ■fact. They claim to have presented the plans, specifications and idea in connection with a casket used by the defendant fo return to the United States the bodies <of military personnel buried overseas.
In 1944 the Office of the Quartermaster General of the Army Service Forces, anticipating the authorization by Congress of a program for the return from overseas cemeteries deceased military…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Moore v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928
- American Potato Dryers, Inc. v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Fincke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Prestex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Farrand Optical Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- American Hoist & Derrick, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.