Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Massey v. Farmers Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1992No. 75279Published

1ConcurrenceOpala, Chief Justice

The court pronounces today that a fire insurance policy’s statutorily mandated damage-assessment procedure, referred to *886in the policy as an “appraisal” 1 — by which a court-appointed umpire determines the amount of actual cash value of a fire loss— binds the party invoking the appraisal procedure (the Insurer in this case) but does not bind the nondemanding party (the Insured in this case). Today’s opinion reasons that the fire loss assessment procedure violates the Insured’s fundamental-law right to a jury trial guaranteed by Art. 2, § 19, Okl. Const.2

While I join in the result reached by…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API