Legal Opinion

Mallory v. American Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1967No. 43153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberharot, Judge.

There may have been some misunderstanding as to the meaning or import of our decision on the former appearance because of some language in the body of the decision which indicates that we construed the evidence to authorize a finding that the claimant suffered a “new accident” when he reached the point of being unable to continue with his work. But the holding of the case was that the evidence was sufficient to authorize a finding that the gradual worsening of the claimant’s condition was at least partly attributable to his physical activity in the continuing of his work…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noles v. Aragon MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Employers Liability Insurance v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carey v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Schwartz v. GreenbaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Barron v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. King v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API