Legal Opinion

Tarrant Apparel Group v. Camuto Consulting Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered October 20, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) by defendants With You and Simpson to dismiss the eighth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

*557Performance rendered directly to plaintiff would indicate that plaintiff is a third-party beneficiary (see e.g. Internationale Nederlanden [U.S.] Capital Corp. v Bankers Trust Co., 261 AD2d 117, 123 [1999]). Drawing all inferences in plaintiffs favor, as one must on a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Artwear, Inc. v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Internationale Nederlanden (U.S.) Capital Corporation v. Bankers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. New York Pepsi-Cola Distributors Ass'n v. Pepsico, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LOGAN-BALDWIN, EMMELYN v. L.S.M. GENERAL CONTRACTORSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Commissioner of the Dept. of Social Servs. of the City of N.Y. v. New York-Presbyterian Hosp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API