Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 2010Published

1Dissent

Tom, J.P., and Moskowitz, J., dissent

in a memorandum by Tom, J.P., as follows: While under the circumstances of this case the police had an objective credible reason to approach defendant to request information, the officers’ subsequent detention of defendant exceeded the scope of the permissible inquiry and violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from undue interference with his liberty. Defendant’s minimal use of force in the attempt to get away from the officers was a direct consequence of his unlawful detention and does not attenuate the illegally initiated police intrusion upon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API