Legal Opinion

International Shoe MacHine Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 23, 1974No. 73-1337PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

Appellant taxpayer contends that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue erroneously treated income realized from the appellant’s sales of certain shoe machines as “property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of his trade or business”, 26 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(1)(B), thereby taxing it as ordinary income instead of treating it under the capital gains provisions of the Code, and assessing deficiencies against the taxpayer. After having paid the deficiencies, the appellant filed claims for refunds, which were denied, and then instituted the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Philber Equipment Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Recordak Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Charlie Hillard and Mary Jane Hillard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. Continental Can Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Honeywell, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  2. Gamble v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Ofria v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  4. Gamble v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  5. Honeywell, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API