Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 27, 1905No. 15,489PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action by W. T. Hughes against W. J. Smith and others. Judgment for plaintiff was reversed by the Court of Appeal, and plaintiff applies for certiorari or writ of review.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in solido to recover 8110, balance due on a subcontract for tiling and wainscoting a -certain hotel building in the city of Shreveport.

Defendant W. J. Smith was the contractor, and the other defendants are the owners of the building.

The cause of action, as against the owners, is “that they failed to take a sufficient bond, as required by law statutes, to secure the payment of laborers, subcontractors, and ma.terialmen.”

The district court rendered judgment fm favor of the plaintiff against all the defendants in solido. The owners appealed there-.from to the Court of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salem Brick & Lumber Co. v. LeSassierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  2. Neith Lodge, No. 21, I. O. O. F. v. VordenbaumenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Lichtentag v. FeitelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arrow Construction Co., Inc. v. American Emp. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Gateway Barge Line, Inc. v. RB Tyler CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. State v. C. S. Jackson & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Bickham v. WomackSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API