Legal Opinion
In re Fisher
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1974No. 73-903PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
Appellant presents two issues for this court’s consideration.
In his first proposition of law, appellant maintains that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which does not attack the jurisdiction of the court which committed the petitioner to the custody of the respondent does not state a claim upon which habeas corpus relief may be granted under E. C. 2725.05.
In his second proposition of law, appellant urges that the due-process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not require the mandatory appointment of counsel for an indigent in a civil mental…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- In re MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.