Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mummaw v. Mummaw

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1988No. 88-661Published

1Concurrence

NIMMONS, Judge,

specially concurring.

If we were writing on a clean slate, I would have difficulty with that portion of the Court’s opinion which orders stricken the provision terminating the wife's exclusive use and benefit of the parties’ marital home if she “cohabits with an unrelated male” on the premises. However, in view of the consistency of expressions on the subject emanating from our appellate courts,1 I concur with the court’s opinion. *739But on remand, I would expressly permit the trial court, should it elect to do so, to amend the final judgment by including a provision of the kind…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Danoff v. DanoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Greer v. GreerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Howard v. HowardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Miller v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Aycock v. AycockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API