Legal Opinion · Dissent

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Heinold v. Schwass

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 6, 1993No. 92-2176Published

1DissentGoshorn, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The trial court’s order on child support comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness and the appellant has the burden to bring forward a record that demonstrates reversible error or an abuse of discretion. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); Fenner v. Fenner, 599 So.2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 4th DCA), appeal dismissed & review denied, 613 So.2d 3 (Fla.1992); Moore v. Moore, 512 So.2d 1141, 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The appellant here has failed to carry its burden.

In lieu of a transcript of the hearing below,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Wright v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Walt v. WaltDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Moore v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Hoover v. SprecherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API