Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. United States of America v. Rockwell International Corporation, Rocketdyne Division, and John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1997No. 97-55089PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Three potential targets of an ongoing grand jury investigation (“Does” or “the appellants”) appeal the district court’s refusal to exercise its supervisory powers to monitor the grand jury’s proceedings and to hold a pre-indictment hearing pursuant to Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S.Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972) (a “Kastigar hearing”). 1 Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Rockwell International Corporation, Rocketdyne Division (“Roeketdyne”), is a eompa ny that tests and markets various rocket fuel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served UponCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Issued to Charles D. Bailin. Edward Silva, Jr. Silva Harvesting Inc. Edward O.C. Ord, Inc. Ord & Norman v. United States of America, Edward Silva, Jr., an Individual Silva Harvesting Inc. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. David Kinamon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RobinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2018