Porter v. K & S PARTNERSHIP

The reasons given to dissolve the preliminary injunction by the majority will be inexplicable to the District Court, as indeed they are to me.

*185There is no showing in the majority opinion that the plaintiff here failed to establish a prima facie right to preliminary injunctive relief, Troglia v. Bartoletti (1969), 152 Mont. 365, 451 P.2d 106; nor that the District Court in issuing the preliminary injunction made an erroneous conclusion of law, Ring v. Spina (2d Cir. 1945), 148 F.2d 647. Instead, the majority dissolves the injunction on an incorrect perception of the “status quo involved” and…