Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nieves v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 28, 2019No. 17-1174Published

1DissentJustice Sotomayor

We granted certiorari to decide whether probable cause alone always suffices to defeat a First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court answers that question "no"-a correct and sensible bottom line on which eight Justices agree. There is no basis in § 1983 or in the Constitution to withhold a remedy for an arrest that violated the First Amendment solely because the officer could point to probable cause that some offense, no matter how trivial or obviously pretextual, has occurred.

Unfortunately, a slimmer majority of the Court chooses not to stop there. The majority…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API