Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1994No. 93-1335PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On this appeal from convictions and sentences for armed robbery, armed kidnapping and armed burglary of a conveyance, we reject the only point directed to the trial. In our view, the isolated reference in the assistant state attorney’s opening statement to the fact that the investigating officer

got a bunch of pictures from a Metro-Dade robbery detective and presented [the victim] with a stack of forty-five or fifty pictures

did not prejudicially convey to the jury that the defendant — whose picture was included— “has committed prior crimes or has previously been in trouble with the police,”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Loftin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Mancebo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API