Detroit Free Press Co. v. Bagg
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This action was commenced in the circuit court for the county of Wayne on November 30, 1886, by filing a declaration on the common counts in assumpsit. January 5, 1887, a bill of particulars was filed of various items claimed by plaintiff, commencing of date January 29, 1873, and ending July 31, same year. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice of the statute of limitations as a defense.
Dpon the trial it was admitted that the merchandise set forth in plaintiff's bill of particulars was had by the defendant at the dates thereof, and was worth the several amounts charged…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Erickson v. . MacYNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Clabaugh v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Korby v. SosnowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Schram v. KoppinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940
- Christe v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.