City of Louisville v. Louisville Livestock Exchange, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Van Sant, Commissioner
—Affirming.
The sole question for determination is whether a city of the Commonwealth may adopt daylight-saving time, while the State at large remains on standard time. On April 23, 1941, the Board of Aldermen of the City of Louisville, which is in the Central Time belt, enacted an ordinance declaring that the standard of time within the City of Louisville, between the last Sunday in April and the last Sunday in September in each year, shall be flm Standard Central Time advanced one houw The 0 moral Assembly of 1942 adopted an act, chapter 95, now…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Massachusetts State Grange v. BentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. BadolatiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Massachusetts State Grange v. BentonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phillips v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Playboy Club, Inc. v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Hamilton v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Phillips v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957