Legal Opinion

A. J. Industries, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1967No. 114-64PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION PER CURIAM:

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Roald A. Hogenson with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on March 1, 1967. Plaintiff has filed exceptions to the commissioner’s findings and recommended conclusion of law and the case has been submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the parties. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s findings, opinion, and recommended conclusion of law, with the deletion of one finding, as hereinafter set…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Rhodes v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. Denman v. BrumbackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. J. Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. The El Paso Company, and El Paso Natural Gas Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  3. Jupiter Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Ribas v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API