Legal Opinion
MJM Advertising, Inc. v. Panasonic Industrial Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered December 22, 2000, which, in an action by related advertising agencies and one of their former principals against a former client and a competitor advertising agency, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action insofar as addressed to the causes of action against the client for unjust enrichment and tortious interference with contract and against the competitor for breach of an oral employment contract, and denied such motions insofar as addressed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wiener v. Lazard Freres & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bauman Associates, Inc. v. H & M International Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- American Preferred Prescription, Inc. v. Health Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sergeants Benevolent Ass'n Annuity Fund v. RenckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Prime Mover Capital Partners L.P. v. Elixir Gaming Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Trafalgar Power Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Pramer S.C.A. v. Abaplus International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010