Legal Opinion

Tennessee Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Anderson County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

By the bill complainant asks that the defendants, Anderson County and C. W. Cantrell, Superintendent of Roads in said county, be enjoined for condemning a strip of ground through its property for road purposes.

It is conceded that defendants were acting under the authority of Chapter 446 of the Private Acts of 1933 (applicable to Anderson County), which complainant insists is unconstitutional, for the reason that under section 2 thereof no provision, is made for the payment of the increase in the award that the landowner might obtain upon appeal to the circuit court. The chancellor sustained…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Falconer v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
  4. City of Memphis v. HastingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Williamson County v. Franklin & Spring Hill Turnpike C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mills v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Ragland v. Davidson County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API