Legal Opinion
1st Amendment Praetorian v. The New York Times Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 28, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00012Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□ □□ lst AMENDMENT PRAETORIAN, Plaintiff, -against- 23 CIVIL 00012 (MKV) JUDGMENT THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and ALAN FEUER,, Defendants. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 28, 2025, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. Accordingly, the Court finds that granting Plaintiff leave to amend here would be futile. See Chunn v. Amtrak,
916 F.3d 204, 208
(2d Cir. 2019) (citing Tocker v. Philip Morris Cos., Inc.,
470 F.3d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Edward Tocker v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Also Known as Altria Group, Inc., Kraft Foods Inc., and General Foods Corp., No. 04-5904-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Chunn v. AmtrakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019