McCoy Restaurants, Inc. v. City of Orlando
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSharp, Judge
I agree that the trial court properly dismissed Counts I and IV of the complaint because appellant failed to sufficiently allege standing as a taxpayer to challenge the airline agreements involved in this case,1 and appellant failed to allege a cause of action for tortious interference with a business relationship in Count II.
I think appellant sufficiently pleaded grounds to challenge the agreements under the Sunshine Law in Count III. § 286.011, Fla.Stat. (1988). The Aviation Authority is a public body to which the Sunshine Law appears applicable. § 286.011(1); Wood v. Marston, 442 So.2d 934…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Palm Beach v. GradisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Wood v. MarstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Neu v. Miami Herald Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Godheim v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.