Legal Opinion

State v. Halstead

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1998No. A97A2516PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Chief Judge.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Jason S. Halstead’s motion to suppress the results from an Intoxilyzer 5000 test on the grounds that the officer who stopped him failed to read the implied consent rights in the exact language mandated by OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b). We affirm.

OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b) states that the officer shall select and read to the person the appropriate implied consent warning. The appropriate consent warning in this case is, in pertinent part: “After first submitting to the required state tests, you are entitled to additional chemical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. O'DONNELLCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Richards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KirbabasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. State v. LevinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Rojas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. State v. MoncriefCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API