Legal Opinion

Armacost v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1982No. 53,089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes J.:

Plaintiff, Virginia C. Armacost, appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, in an action to recover personal injury protection (PIP) disability benefits pursuant to her automobile insurance contract with State Farm and the Kansas Automobile Injury Reparation Act, K.S.A. 40-3101 et seq. (the Act). As the facts were undisputed, both parties filed motions for summary judgment. Defendant prevailed and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is a school teacher and has been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hand v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  2. Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armacost v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API