Legal Opinion
ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 5, 1978No. C-73-2238 SC and C-73-2239 SCPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTI, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on IBM’s motion for a directed verdict. F.R.Civ.P. 50(a). In Chisholm Brothers Farm Equipment Co. v. International Harvester Co., 498 F.2d 1137, 1140 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1023, 95 S.Ct. 500, 42 L.Ed.2d 298 (1974), the Ninth Circuit said:
When considering the propriety of the grant or denial of a motion for directed verdict, the correct standard is whether or not, viewing the evidence as a whole, there is substantial evidence present that could support a finding, by reasonable jurors, for the nonmoving party. “Substantial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Chisholm Brothers Farm Equipment Co. v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- NW Controls, Inc. v. Outboard Marine CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Memorex Corporation, Etc. v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Memorex Corporation, Etc. v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Data General Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.