Legal Opinion
Hughes v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 16, 1972No. 445, September Term, 1971PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
BRUCE WILDEN HUGHES does not claim that the evidence adduced at his trial before a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County was not sufficient to sustain his convictions of committing a certain unnatural and perverted sexual practice on each of 17 January and 24 January 1971 with Frank Edward Dunklee, Jr., a male child under the age of eighteen years. 1 But he asserts that the convictions must be set aside because the statute proscribing his conduct is unconstitutional, and he claims that in any event the trial court committed prejudicial error in the admission of certain evidence.
I
Code…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State v. BatemanArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. LairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- In Re a Special Investigation No. 228Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.