Legal Opinion

AMG Associates v. Township of Springfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 9, 1974PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Hall, J.

This zoning case involves the following situation: A municipality strip zones the frontage along a main thoroughfare for certain business uses to a specified depth, regardless of property lines. The land to the rear, fronting on side streets, is essentially limited to residential use. An owner’s main street property extends into the residence zone, resulting in a so-called “split lot.” That portion limited to residential use is much too small to meet the minimum area, frontage and side yard requirements of a lot in that zone. Even were some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of ThomastonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Spanich v. City of LivoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Baronoff v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Lapenas v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Township of Long BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Borough of Saddle River v. 66 East Allendale, LLC (070525)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. So. Burl. Cty. NAACP v. Tp. of Mt. LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Tp. of Dover v. Bd. of Adj. of Tp. of DoverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Thomas Griepenburg v. Township of Ocean (073290)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API