Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Texarkana National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1984No. 9221PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation appeals from an order of the district court dissolving a writ of attachment. The controversy developed in this fashion: The FDIC brought suit against H.E. Fagan to recover an indebtedness arising out of a bank failure, and as an incident to the suit it obtained a writ of attachment which was executed by seizing two checks totaling $28,784.20, payable by The Texarkana National Bank to Fagan. The checks were deposited in the registry of the court until the FDIC obtained a judgment, after which the funds were released by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BransonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. United States v. KinneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Arkansas ex rel. Tucker v. SaboCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Brown v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  5. City of Munday v. First State Bank of MundayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dispensa v. University State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API