Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Trefethen v. Dalton

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1933No. Docket No. 7072Published

1Concurrence

CONREY, P. J., Concurring.

I concur in the judgment. While the record has been examined, I think it appropriate to suggest that the court is not under obligation to search the record for errors beyond those properly brought to light in an appellant’s brief.

In Rule YIII, section 3, governing the practice on appeals, it is provided that “the pleadings need not be printed in such briefs, but the nature of the action and the substance of the pleadings must be stated in general terms”. Section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to appeals presented under the so-called “alternative…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Birkland v. Ratteree Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API