Legal Opinion

Jones v. Van Nuys

California Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1911No. L.A. No. 2688PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered against him after demurrer sustained to his amended complaint.

Kate W. Dobbins is made a party defendant under an allegation that she is a proper party plaintiff who refused to join with plaintiff as such and hence is made a defendant. No relief is asked against her, the real parties to the action being the plaintiff and the defendant I. N. Van Nuys.

The complaint alleged the making of a contract, or water deed, on June 3, 1880, between James Foord of the first part and William H. Stephens, Kate W. Dobbins, Henry P. Tallant, and V. S. Owen,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garvey Water Co. v. Huntington Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Chrisman v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Morton v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953
  5. Morton v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API