Legal Opinion

Harker v. Burbank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1903No. 12,475PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Burt county: Charles T. Dickinson, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, C.

The plaintiff in error commenced this action in the district court for Burt county to recover of the defendants a sum of money alleged to be due and owing to him on an appeal bond given to himself and one William Harker, jointly, in the words and figures following:

“Know all men by these presents, That we, Sarah J. Burbank, as principal, and J. B. Walker and C. H. P. Busse, sureties, are held and firmly bound unto Joseph Harker and William Harker as in the following conditions set forth: The condition of the above obligaton is such, that whereas, in an action of forcible detainer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Violet v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fox v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Leach v. the Milburn Wagon Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Bowen v. CrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hecker v. Ravenna BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. TNT Cattle Co. v. FifeNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Stone v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Pritchard v. MinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Wolfenbarger v. BrittNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API