W.T.A. v. Yeager

WOODARD, Judge.

W.T.A. (Mr. A) appeals a summary judgment in State Farm’s favor, finding that no reasonable interpretation of the insurance policy at issue could afford coverage to S.J.S.H.A.D. (Ms. D) for any of the allegations in Mr. A’s petition for damages against her. We affirm.

* # # * *

A.J.A. is the son of Mr. A. and Ms. D, who were divorced in 1994. Ms. D remarried R.D. in 1995. A.J.A. lived with them.

During the domestic proceeding that underlies Mr. A’s cause of action, the court appointed an expert therapist to evaluate all parties. Ms. D retained a different therapist, Ms. Marcie…