Jessup v. High Point, Thomasville & Denton Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The defendant admitted in the answer- that on infrequent occasions boys had boarded and ridden its freight cars in its yard in the City of High Point. Coupled with the admission, however, and as a part of it, is the averment that in boarding the cars the boys did so at a distance from the stations occupied by the train crew, thereby eluding efforts to apprehend them. . ■
The evidence introduced by the plaintiff is sufficient to-'show that Charles Carroll, age 14, had ridden defendant's train at least on 10 occasions; that on one occasion a member of the crew saw him. His younger brother had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Brigman v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Brigman v. Fiske-Carter Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Bell v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Newton v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Arnold Hashtani v. Duke Power Company, a Corporation of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.