Legal Opinion

Jessup v. High Point, Thomasville & Denton Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1956No. 605PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant admitted in the answer- that on infrequent occasions boys had boarded and ridden its freight cars in its yard in the City of High Point. Coupled with the admission, however, and as a part of it, is the averment that in boarding the cars the boys did so at a distance from the stations occupied by the train crew, thereby eluding efforts to apprehend them. . ■

The evidence introduced by the plaintiff is sufficient to-'show that Charles Carroll, age 14, had ridden defendant's train at least on 10 occasions; that on one occasion a member of the crew saw him. His younger brother had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Brigman v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Brigman v. Fiske-Carter Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Bell v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Newton v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Arnold Hashtani v. Duke Power Company, a Corporation of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API