Legal Opinion

Schenkman v. Schenkman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrenner, J.

A novel question has been presented upon this traverse. It is whether, after delivery of a process, failure to leave it following defendant’s plain deception of the process server amounts to a failure to comply with rule 53 of the Buies of Civil Practice. This rule requires that the process server must make an affidavit that ‘ ‘ he left with the defendant a copy of the summons ”, etc.

Upon the evidence the court finds it to he a fact that the process server first exhibited and then delivered the summons and complaint in the within matrimonial action to the defendant; that he thereafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gumperz v. HofmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Gumperz v. HofmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Levine v. National Transportation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Levine v. National Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Wight v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Chernick v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Barclay v. Crown Building & Development, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. In re BarbaraNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Fagin v. FaginNevada Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API