Schenkman v. Schenkman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrenner, J.
A novel question has been presented upon this traverse. It is whether, after delivery of a process, failure to leave it following defendant’s plain deception of the process server amounts to a failure to comply with rule 53 of the Buies of Civil Practice. This rule requires that the process server must make an affidavit that ‘ ‘ he left with the defendant a copy of the summons ”, etc.
Upon the evidence the court finds it to he a fact that the process server first exhibited and then delivered the summons and complaint in the within matrimonial action to the defendant; that he thereafter…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gumperz v. HofmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Gumperz v. HofmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Levine v. National Transportation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953
- Levine v. National Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Wight v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Chernick v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Barclay v. Crown Building & Development, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re BarbaraNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Fagin v. FaginNevada Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.