Legal Opinion

Caulfield v. Lobenstine

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGenung, J.

This is a controversy submitted upon an agreed statement of facts. The premises involved are located at 434-436 Bast Fifty-seventh street, borough of Manhattan. To the outside walls of these two houses were attached party wall balconies as fire escapes for the joint use of the occupants, and so constructed as to be accessible from one window of each building.

In 1880 these two premises were conveyed by the then owner, John Livingston, to Elizabeth Floyd by a single deed. In 1902 the premises located at 434 East Fifty-seventh street were conveyed *286by the heirs of Elizabeth Floyd to William H.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. . CloonanNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Farley v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Shoemaker v. ShoemakerNew York Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Farley v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Schrymser v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stark v. MuleNew York Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API