Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Hughes

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 5, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00099Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00099-JHM-HBB DONALD M. LYNCH PETITIONER VS. CRAIG HUGHES, WARDEN RESPONDENT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND RECOMMENDATION I. BACKGROUND Petitioner Donald M. Lynch filed, pro se, his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(DN 1).1 Respondent Craig Hughes filed a response to Lynch’s petition (DN 16). Lynch filed a reply in support of his habeas petition (DN 18). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Lynch’s habeas petition (DN 1) be DENIED…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API