Legal Opinion · Dissent

Franklin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1979No. 79-191Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I respectfully dissent because I do not think the rigid due process requirements insisted upon by the majority are appropriate in this case or mandated by the due process clauses of the Constitution of Arkansas and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. In none of the cases cited by the majority is there the combination of factors presented here. The governmental interest in the prompt and effective abatement of public nuisances is one important factor. In addition, the proceedings are conducted in accordance with procedures in chancery courts, and all courts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API