Legal Opinion

Ceranto v. Trimboli

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Randolph County. Action by Rosina Trimboli Ceranto aganist Vincenzo Trimboli. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

POPFENBARGER, PRESIDENT:

In the circuit court of Randolph county, Rosina Trim-boli Ceranto, an infant suing by her next friend, recovered a judgment against Vincenzo Trimboli, for $351.15, in an action of debt, to which judgment a writ of error was allowed.

The final order seems to stand upon the theory of an office judgment made final by operation of law under the statute. It' recites that the defendant had been duly served with process more than thirty days prior to the date thereof; that the case had been properly docketed; that an affidavit of the plaintiff had been filed with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brewster v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Cameron v. HicksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dudley v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Comstock v. Droney Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. McCray v. Craig & SonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Woods v. TeterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API